Forever Learning

Forever learning and helping machines do the same.

the Trick to 42

with 4 comments

Frank Buytendijk, in his book Performance Leadership, writes the following.

Most people I asked, and most sources I referred to, define an organization similarly as β€œa group of people that share the same goals and objectives”.

[…] Working with this definition of an organization, leads you to think that stakeholders all share a set of central goals and objectives, and can be aligned in this direction. In reality, nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, many of the goals and objectives live at odds with one another. Shareholders want the highest possible shareholder value; employees look for job security and a place to build their skills and make a career; customers want a good price and a decent product or service; and suppliers want to sell as much as they can.

He subsequently proposes an alternative definition.

I have adopted what I think is a better definition of what constitutes an organization: An organization is a unique collaboration of stakeholders for the purpose of realizing goals they could not achieve by themselves. The trick to performance management is not to align everyone to the same goals and objectives, but in finding ways to bridge conflicting goals and objectives.

Shooting Range

Each his own Target

In my view, Frank is being modest here, this in not just the trick to performance management; it is the trick (but not the answer) to life, the universe and everything. Once you realize that not everyone wants the same things you do, the world gains quite a few interesting dimensions.

So don’t try to align everyone to your goals and objectives, but find ways to bridge the gaps and resolve conflicts. There is no need for everyone to agree to want the same thing, if we can find a solution where everyone can have what he or she wants.

Please, feel free to disagree with me in the comments; I’m sure we can work things out, and learn a thing or two on the way. πŸ™‚

Written by Lukas Vermeer

July 10, 2010 at 15:27

Posted in BI, Oracle

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Interesting theory. I haven’t viewed it that way.

    I think I agree, but I haven’t put it to the test yet, so I’ll get back to you on that πŸ˜‰

    I do think however that it’s better to find someone with the same goals as you than it is working with someone with different goals (each working toward their own goals by working together).


    July 11, 2010 at 13:20

    • It’s probably a lot easier working with someone who has the same goals, but not as interesting. πŸ™‚


      July 11, 2010 at 13:23

      • But if one of your goals is to make it interesting, then it would be impossible fo find someone with exactly the same goals.

        Thus concluding that you’ll need to find someone with which you could realize your own goals, including the goal that it should be interesting πŸ˜‰


        July 11, 2010 at 13:42

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: